Textbooks: It's Time to Listen to Students' Demands for Real Value
February 21st, 2012As the dust has settled on Apple’s iBooks Author, it’s interesting to see the announcement’s impact. The model’s surprising lack of imagination was widely explored and in perfect pitch IMHO by Audrey Watters. We’re used to innovation from Apple, but its new offering, well … as I said to a reporter who asked for an opinion about its ability to shake up the textbook market, there are disruptions coming, but this isn’t one of them.
But though it may not accelerate the textbook market today, I think the Apple e-textbook announcement has had an impact by fueling the discussion of the archaic nature of the present textbook model and where our future lies. To that I say, well done.
Our disappointments in the textbook market form a well-worn trail, starting with ever-loftier prices foisted upon students and their parents. Over the past few decades the needs of professors and students alike have received little attention as publishers have tried to combat the used book market with shorter revision cycles and fought for market share through sheer volume of new entrants. It’s created an expensive machine to operate, and it’s being funded by students. Alas, those practices have brought about a backlash that is fueling the drive for a new model today.
I was just alerted to an ongoing study of student attitudes by the Book Industry Study Group (BISG) that says students are opting out of the purchase of current editions of textbooks – new or used – at an alarming rate. Only 59% now invest in the current edition. Read that last sentence this way: More than 40% of students don’t see value in their assigned text. What are they doing instead? They’re renting (but only 11%), buying old editions, or illegally downloading or photocopying. Or they’re doing their best to pass the course without getting any version of the assigned text whatsoever.
And they’re also complaining. Students are looking for value in return for these high prices, and they don’t complain to the bookstore, they complain to the person who assigned the book. A theme I hear frequently among faculty is that they’re searching for classroom materials – including textbooks – that will reduce friction between teacher and student.
That friction is about more than just high prices. While traditional textbooks serve an important purpose – providing a narrative framework that leads students through a course of study – some of what they do can be achieved more effectively through other means, including lectures, articles, and videos. In addition, elements such as assessment tools, study questions, and primary documents that often now find themselves bundled with textbooks can probably best be handled in a Web environment. This gets to the disassembling of the traditional textbook, an option mentioned by Audrey Watters in discussing another recent entrant into the field, Inkling Habitat, the e-book publishing platform from iPad publisher Inkling.
A pdf of a text – the current form of most so-called e-textbooks – is not the answer, especially when it costs virtually the same as the print edition. We need a monumental shift in the textbook model to address the needs of students and professors. For my part, I think that the Web offers the most powerful and flexible platform for future classroom materials, because it so can so easily connect students to a wealth of primary sources, analysis, and even real-time news, with pedagogical and workflow tools built in. All due respect to Apple, increasing learning outcomes does not require fancy software and 3D graphics (or $500 gadgets). All that’s required is to provide educators with better, more flexible materials and tools, ones that are affordable for students.
And by the way, these new models are out there. Inspired faculty are building them for themselves, and upstart publishers with no revenue legacy to protect are creating them for other faculty to adopt. I humbly offer our own Milestone Documents as one such example. One metric we pay special attention to among the classes that adopt our site is the percentage of enrolled students who sign up. It’s a lot higher than 59%. Our platform is still young, with many useful features still to come, but this tells me that we are on the right path, and that the students using the site are pleased with the value we are providing.
If our site is any indication, these new models are developing a loyal following. Nonetheless, change in the larger industry isn’t occurring fast enough for students. It’s time to abandon suspicion of change and listen to what students – and educators – are saying. It’s time to deliver real value.


